Automobilista 2 Custom Force Feedback - Overview & Recommendations

How dare you make up this story that there are groups of people who are angry with you for no reason whatsoever, when no one here has quoted, spoken, written, involved and/or had references to you!!!

You are addressing me (or a group) unjustifiably through Stakanov who you also accuse, what should I answer you today? How should I treat you with a bouquet of flowers? I am not (as you define us) Stakanov's "horseman", I am only what 2 years ago (due to a discussion where you made a bad impression) called "son of a good mother"!! What did you want me to answer then? That I love you?

In another two years, will you say that today I or we stalked you? Or that you are a victim of us violent villains? And what are you?

These are called free insults and it's you who uses legally relevant adjectives such as "insults, assaults, gang leaders" so I'm following the report of Stakanov, you were looking for an excuse or a reasoneven if I know that nothing will happen today like back then... and the only one having fun here is you,

 

Using the ATMOS file and I'm quite impressed with the FFB I get on my Logitech G Pro. One tweak I'd like to make is when getting bumped by other cars, is there anything I can chnage in the FFB file to enhance the bumps? I like to know when I'm being pushed around by the opponents. Thanks

 

Typo: should be "... fr_details_pos ..."

 

@Racinglegend1234 and @Dmand for try lowering master rack to 0.75 this should reduce the sense of weight of the rack (if that's what you're looking for because I wouldn't want it to lose fullness) and thus free up some resources, then correct the code forgotten by Stakanov by typo indicated by @ViperMan3 ... just to summarize did you leave the speeds at 1.000, 0.750 or 0.500?? and prefer rack at 1.00 or 0.75?

@everyone, we are just trying to calibrate a file with different proportions from the original file and which will be the future basis of other files, and it must be done now here or elsewhere, it should not be done later, I hope there is a pleasant environment because frankly I don't understandwhere certain frustrations arise, thanks to those who continue to give feedback.and thanks also to those who don't do it and remain equally friendly because there is no point in being something else

 

@Danielkart when I say frustrated I'm referring to you, I apologize if it wasn't clear but the content of what you wrote doesn't make sense, it's surreal (as well as being serious) and I'm not defending anyone and I'm not part of any group and I don't think that your like to me refers to an interest in the file.
You did it all yourself have the kindness to make this a quiet place and non-toxic. I want to talk about ffb stop, the problem is yours but let's move on.and I think it's everyone's will.

 

I think it's just a problem of calibrating the various parts of the file with the new values and without saturations occurring which in this case inhibit the surface of the flat edges with some tracks and cars. Once this is resolved we can move on, let's hope we succeed otherwise we insert the proportions and scales of all the other files and move on. For now set only if you like in the main dials the rack to 0.75 and no 1.00. Thank you

 

I have done some more testing. I switched the rack to 0.75 and noticed I had put one of the velocity values to 1.5 instead of 0.5. I tried the other values and both rack and velocity on 0.75 felt the best. The loss of grip feeling felt like it was there for the front, but sometimes it didn't feel like it was there for the rear though

 

Further testing shows maybe the high velocity stiffness is too much and kerbs make the ffb clip when going at medium speeds and higher (F-U G2 as a reference). So a speed multiplier seems to be too high
Edit: the clipping occurs at speeds greater than 160 km/h and I need to lower the FFB gain to less than 70% in the F-U G2 and Cadillac LMDh car to not get clipping through high speed corners

 

If only we had a problem to clarify and and if only he had sent me a message of doubt too ... but there were no problems before and there are none now, have arisen only unfortunately insulting accusations.
I think I will activate the ignore user function because it will probably be the only solution to ensure that abusive situations no longer occur ... thanks anyway and sorry for disturb.

 

Hey guys!

As promised, here is my new file V2000 and the explanation. I noticed that the 3 tire resistances can interfere with each other or there is overlap.This causes the FFB to become disturbed and not as pure and balanced.That's why this file only works with 1 tire resistance, so I can tune it much more precisely and the center is filled better.This can also be clearly seen in the FFB histogram, which means that the forces work in a much more balanced manner.In addition, I increased the micro_bumps but at the same time smoothed them more to get more feedback.

As always, this file also supports the following bases with my recommended settings (can be seen in the file)

Optimized for Simucube 2 Pro (25Nm) (My reference base)
Optimized for Simucube 2 Sport (17Nm)
Optimized for Moza R21 V2 (21Nm)
Optimized for Moza R16 V2 (16Nm)
Optimized for Moza R12 V2 (12Nm)
Optimized for Moza R9 V2 (9Nm)
Optimized for Fanatec Podium DD1 (20Nm)
Optimized for Fanatec Podium DD2 (25Nm)
Optimized for Fanatec CSL DD Base (8Nm)
Optimized for Simagic Alpha Mini (10Nm)
Optimized for Simagic Alpha (15NM)
Optimized for Simagic Ultimate (23Nm)
Optimized for Assetek La Prima (12Nm)
Optimized for Assetek Forte (18Nm)
Optimized for Assetek Invicta (27Nm)
Optimized for VRS (20Nm)
Optimized for Cammus C15 (15Nm)
Optimized for Cammus C12 (12Nm)

Change log of the V2000 file

1. New interpretation of tire resistances
2. Micro_bump_scale adjustment
3. slight increase in high curb feel
4. slight adjustment of the IN-Game value FX

Have fun with it

Danielkarts V2000 for all bases

 

Even if I am testing other files, I inform you, before I move on to conclusions, that for some time in everyday life I have been using your old modified V70 version file (without some aberrations) which from time to time I update with some values after comparing your new onesweekly files and change some values if I notice the improvement.

But we have to be honest, we are exaggerating a bit, inserting 1 resistance at 90 with timing 0 is the same thing as setting three resistence at 30 with timing 0 (because they add at the same time to initial resistance), your file has been like this for a long time, not you changed absolutely nothing.
Regarding the other entries, for many months lately you have been changing two items and publishing a file every week, then changing two more and republishing another.

You are welcome here and thanks for your files, but you've become a bit of a troll in file postings for a while now. They are not your personal interpretations, they are your craving for protagonism.

Now it just so happens it's the turn of the resistances and the kerbs, after you have accused the world and then complain that the others are offensive. Aren't all stupid here.

I'm changing my mind about your goodness. The file is beautiful, like the others yesterday you can download it like all the others.

 

Guys,
Do I have to remind you all that KINDNESS goes a long way?
Also, be aware this forum is in English but there are quite a few whose native language is not English. Some have to use a translator of sort and sure enough those posts can come across differently than intended.
So, calm down and drive fast instead.
Cheers.

 

Ok so it seems like either you get info with too soft steering or you get no info with too hard steering. I have no idea if that helps, but it seems like something needs to be turned down without making the steering wheel too light and without clipping
Edit: The clipping seems to be the biggest issue in high DF cars with stiff springs

 

I tried this with the settings recommended in the file, I think I didn't make a mistake, but I hear a background noise that is always present, the rally is too noisy in fact and as if there is an exaggerated load present in the background, as if there is some texturebelow.
On the other hand, the control of the typical oscillation in the DD is good but you need to keep the damping on the bass as you indicated and not as Reiza recommends.
Am I doing something wrong, does the lack of damping increase this noise?

 

It's difficult for me to say what's bothering you. Maybe the base settings and you like it better with higher damping. Just try it. Or in the in-game settings the value FX. This is a very important control and can be adjusted very differently to suit your preferences. Here too you can simply test it and perhaps reduce FX a little to suit your taste

 

Agree and also a suggestion to whom may be concern, add a clear indication of nacionality at the identifyer (at each posted message).

 

I say that the custom FFB thread users should hold a friendly special Time Trial event and work out our differences on the clock.

We all have things in common. Sim racing is a passion for most if not all of us here.
Lets try and remember that going forward. Together, we are better and the community as a whole becomes better.

I know, i sound like a mother hen.

 

I'll have to get back to you on this one, thanks